@Matt Venn - I think it is one of those things where it reduces reliability by like 2% which is bad for 100k units but not noticable for these small runs
FWIW - No sorting house is able to deal with 50 wafers with 40 bins to sort things into. The industry is set up to either deal with 1 wafer and 40 bins or >1,000 wafers with at most 10 bins.
12:39 a.m.
Basically the machines they use have at most 10 bins to sort things into to, because who would be silly enough to need more than that
12:40 a.m.
So the way they sort 1 wafer into 40 bins is that they program the tool 4 times.
12:41 a.m.
And as they need to pick a whole wafer before moving onto the next wafer, when doing multiple wafers they would have to reprogram the machine 4 times for every wafer. And the programming / setup of the machine can take hours, even though the pick itself can take only minutes.
12:42 a.m.
@Matt Venn - All the quotes for sorting 40 bins come out to be more per wafer than the silicon manufacturing!
Not sure how that would help. Here the reticle is also sliced into die of mostly the same size ( there is the "border ones" which are smaller but all the other are the same ).
I don't understand why they can't program the machine to pick up 10 dies, then run the 24 wafer through though. They have adheside backing right ? so you can pick some dies and then remove them and reload them later ?
tnt
Not sure how that would help. Here the reticle is also sliced into die of mostly the same size ( there is the "border ones" which are smaller but all the other are the same ).
I don't understand why they can't program the machine to pick up 10 dies, then run the 24 wafer through though. They have adheside backing right ? so you can pick some dies and then remove them and reload them later ?
I believe they are worried about the risk every time they do the mounting. I'm sure it's fine for like every 99 out of 100 attempts (or even better) but that last one has an issue and everyone is like super sue happy in this space and such.
Matt Venn
I'm surprised efabless didn't hit this, weren't they were doing multiple wafers into 40 ?
They did a bit, it is the reason you got a smaller bunch of chips back then I would have liked and there where a whole bunch of undiced wafers from each run left over.
A bit slower than hoped. The dies are harder to get off the tape than I would have thought.
We're pretty close though and need to modify the machine and code as the frames they're sitting on and the layout of the reticles are different.
Just the first removed pieces. I was also thinking because these wafers are fairly tall (respectively) they may have been getting caught on the edges as well.
Do we know what kind of backing tape is on these wafers?
Whenever I've seen division done (manually) the tape has been stretched as @tnt 's video example above shows
7:30 a.m.
Also any videos of the robot in action?
stuart
Do we know what kind of backing tape is on these wafers?
Whenever I've seen division done (manually) the tape has been stretched as @tnt 's video example above shows
Not sure, as I understand it, we never really had much if any contact from the dicing house. It was mostly handled by the people who helped work with GF
For those curious, this is how the whole wafer is laid out and how all the projects tile across it.
There is a band that we were unable to use as GF used it for their own purposes. That is the blank spot.
Also not sure why this isn't rendering. I will also post a low res version that should show
2
12:47 p.m.
Greyed out areas are places that could fit a few projects, but GF didn't even make shots in those areas.
The "band" above our reticle is actually part of it. At the time, GF gave us a fixed reticle size which is not divisible by the slot sizes (vertically).
The band is not visible in the reticle render, since this one is without fill in the reticle.
Here's an image of the filled reticle:
1:51 p.m.
1:51 p.m.
There are, however, test structures all around the reticle in very narrow band, ~5-10 times the saw street width.
1:51 p.m.
After the tapeout, we were told that we could adjust the reticle size to remove the band above the reticle. This might yield a few extra dies due to additional exposures.
In the cob place the dies aren't out long enough to collect stuff I think. Surface definitely needs to be clean for bond to work but maybe they just blow air on it before ? ( cc @stuart )
Random question (new to the server, just reading backlog to see what's going on) - why sort to a whole pile of tape feeders directly?
Might it be easier to pick to one long tape (in sorted order), with "padding" inserted between different runs of dies? That one long "master reel" would then be subdivided on a separate system.
davidc__
Random question (new to the server, just reading backlog to see what's going on) - why sort to a whole pile of tape feeders directly?
Might it be easier to pick to one long tape (in sorted order), with "padding" inserted between different runs of dies? That one long "master reel" would then be subdivided on a separate system.
you are asking a good question.
I suspect it's because they're working on multiple wafers and wouldn't want one tape per wafer but possibly multiple wafers per tape, which requires seeking or multiple wafers at once or multiple tapes at once.
1
namibj
you are asking a good question.
I suspect it's because they're working on multiple wafers and wouldn't want one tape per wafer but possibly multiple wafers per tape, which requires seeking or multiple wafers at once or multiple tapes at once.
I'm exploring options for dicing which would allow arbitary die sizes (or even shapes) -- but so far everyone with laser dicing is either to low volume for my use case or to high volume for my use case. My use case is roughly ~50 wafers with ~1,000 die per wafer.
Most people using laser dicing are doing so to reduce the amount of silicon lost to things like scribe lines and improve the economics of very small die.
Oh yeah that can do TSVs might as well use it to cut slots
8:25 a.m.
in irregular chip dicing, DRIE is used with a novel hybrid soft/hard mask to achieve sub-millimeter etching to dice silicon dies into lego-like pieces with irregular shapes.[7][8][9]