Hey, so I was making a bunch of add-on boards for the upcoming next version of Barnacle Board and figured I'd make one that maps your 70 pin mezzanine connector to a breadboard.
Before I finish routing (and adding labels for the COB pads), I figured I should ask y'all some stuff:
Do you even want this?
How likely is it that you want VDD_CORE, VDD_IO, and PWR_AUX separate?
What do you generally do with PWR_AUX?
Is there anything you can think of that would make this more awesome?
1
Architeuthis Flux
Hey, so I was making a bunch of add-on boards for the upcoming next version of Barnacle Board and figured I'd make one that maps your 70 pin mezzanine connector to a breadboard.
Before I finish routing (and adding labels for the COB pads), I figured I should ask y'all some stuff:
Do you even want this?
How likely is it that you want VDD_CORE, VDD_IO, and PWR_AUX separate?
What do you generally do with PWR_AUX?
Is there anything you can think of that would make this more awesome?
How likely is it that you want VDD_CORE, VDD_IO, and PWR_AUX separate?
This was a spec pulled from Tiny Tapeout. Currently they have them all bridged on the die, but that may change in the future. Use your own judgement here.
What do you generally do with PWR_AUX?
Again, this is likely more power pins than a regular design would need. We needed a standard and they had the most robust needs and had the most documentation, so that's how we ended up here.
Is there anything you can think of that would make this more awesome?
Artwork!
Looks great though. Super cool, thanks for sharing!
The whole board is a piece of art. It looks great!
1
Andrew Wingate
Awesome!!
Do you even want this?
Not sure, but it looks super cool!!
How likely is it that you want VDD_CORE, VDD_IO, and PWR_AUX separate?
This was a spec pulled from Tiny Tapeout. Currently they have them all bridged on the die, but that may change in the future. Use your own judgement here.
What do you generally do with PWR_AUX?
Again, this is likely more power pins than a regular design would need. We needed a standard and they had the most robust needs and had the most documentation, so that's how we ended up here.
Is there anything you can think of that would make this more awesome?
Artwork!
Looks great though. Super cool, thanks for sharing!
@Architeuthis Flux - So you going to give creating a custom replacement for your analog muxes a go on the next wafer.space run?
10:03 p.m.
@Architeuthis Flux - It might be worth chatting with @peterkinget and the MOSBius team, they kind of already doing something in the same type of category.
Tim 'mithro' Ansell
@Architeuthis Flux - So you going to give creating a custom replacement for your analog muxes a go on the next wafer.space run?
@Architeuthis Flux - It might be worth chatting with @peterkinget and the MOSBius team, they kind of already doing something in the same type of category.
@Andrew Wingate Which glue is planned to be used to glue the die to the cob, the conductive or non-conductive type? I guess it's conductive so the die bulk will be grounded, right?
Egor Lukyanchenko
@Andrew Wingate Which glue is planned to be used to glue the die to the cob, the conductive or non-conductive type? I guess it's conductive so the die bulk will be grounded, right?
This is something that's a little outside my expertise.
Part of me says there seems to be little reason why we would have anything other than conductive, so would imagine that would be what we ask for.
I also imagine we can have whatever we ask for.
Is there anyone out there who feels strongly either way?
@Tim 'mithro' Ansell