wafer.space Community - How to retrieve run error message from plateform.wafer.space?

Seems like my design is failing some checks on the online plateform (or the plateform itself is failing) with Processing Logs

=== SYSTEM ERROR - See error_message field ===

RETRY #1: Automatic retry after error

=== SYSTEM ERROR - See error_message field ===

RETRY #2: Automatic retry after error

=== SYSTEM ERROR - See error_message field ===

RETRY #3: Automatic retry after error

=== SYSTEM ERROR - See error_message field ===

Is there a way to get more information? I do not see what the "error_message field" refers to

@Clyde Laforge - SYSTEM ERROR means the precheck failed to run correctly.

14:32

Well, looks like I broke the prechecks.....

14:32

column shuttles_shuttle.max_slots does not exist
LINE 1: ...ttle"."description", "shuttles_shuttle"."status", "shuttles_...

For now you can run the same precheck locally: https://github.com/wafer-space/gf180mcu-precheck

GitHub - wafer-space/gf180mcu-precheck: Precheck for wafer.space MP...

Precheck for wafer.space MPW runs using the gf180mcu PDK - GitHub - wafer-space/gf180mcu-precheck: Precheck for wafer.space MPW runs using the gf180mcu PDK

Leo Moser (mole99)

For now you can run the same precheck locally: https://github.com/wafer-space/gf180mcu-precheck

Yes! nix-shell currently compiling

1

I just need to restart the task worker so it picks up the db structure change.

Thank you for looking into this @Tim 'mithro' Ansell

@Leo Moser (mole99) - Now it's one for you I think

Yes

14:39

assert id_cell.bbox() == qrcode_cell.bbox()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError

14:39

@Clyde Laforge Did you place this QR code instance?

14:40

It seems the bounding box is not as expected.

I reused the one that originally came from the pad ring from a couple weeks ago, but maybe there was some update to it?

Clyde Laforge

I reused the one that originally came from the pad ring from a couple weeks ago, but maybe there was some update to it?

Checked and my design seems correct and up to date, with a valid gf180mcu_ws_ip__id cell at 0,0.

Is the instance directly after the top cell in the hierarchy?

14:49

Can you confirm the size of the boundary layer is 142.8, 142.8?

14:49

What is your ID?

Leo Moser (mole99)

Is the instance directly after the top cell in the hierarchy?

Yes

Leo Moser (mole99)

What is your ID?

TRID

Leo Moser (mole99)

Can you confirm the size of the boundary layer is 142.8, 142.8?

Yes

Can you provide me a link to your layout? :)

14:52

(Can also be in private.)

No, it's fine, it's source available (hopefully with a proper open source license soon ^^'): https://github.com/Scafir/gf180mcu-project-trident-gf180-teststructure/blob/3f02c0f9c702dd272a04e1c97542253af30421cf/klayout/top.layout.filled.gds.gz

gf180mcu-project-trident-gf180-teststructure/klayout/top.layout.fil...

Project template for wafer.space MPW runs using the gf180mcu PDK - Scafir/gf180mcu-project-trident-gf180-teststructure

1

I can trigger the same issue. Will look for a solution.

Your database unit (dbu) of the layout is 0.05um. The dbu must be 0.001um and all geometry must be on-grid 0.05um.

15:14

You should be able to easily scale your whole layout :)

15:14

(And I can add a new check to the precheck)

15:17

[16:17:19] ERROR    Subprocess had a non-zero exit.step.py:1383
[16:17:19] ERROR    Last 1 line(s):step.py:1388
                    [Error]: Database unit (dbu) is not 0.001um.

Now that's a better error ;)

Very nice, thank you!

1